🔗 Share this article

The real-life crime category has an innovative format, or perhaps even a whole new language and structure: officer-worn camera recordings. Faces of victims, observers and possible perpetrators loom up to the cameras, at times in the harsh glare of vehicle beams or torches as the officers approach, their expressions and tones expressing caution or fear or anger or dubiously feigned naivety. And we frequently incidentally glimpse the faces of the officers themselves, one standing by blankly while the other conducts the inquiry with what occasionally seems like extraordinary diffidence – though maybe this is because they know they are being recorded.

A Growing Trend in Documentary Filmmaking

We have already had the streaming service real-life crime film American Murder: Gabby Petito, about the killing of an social media personality by her partner, whose main point of interest was officer recordings and in which, as in this film, the police seemed extraordinarily lax with the suspect. There is also Bill Morrison’s Oscar-nominated short Incident, composed entirely of body cam film. Now comes a new film by Geeta Gandbhir about the tragic incident of a Florida mother in Ocala, Florida, a woman of colour whose four young kids allegedly harassed and antagonized her white neighbour, Susan Lorincz. In 2023, after an increasing number of neighborhood conflicts in which the police were repeatedly called, Lorincz shot Owens dead through her locked door, when the victim went to Lorincz’s house to confront her about hurling items at her children.

The Investigation and Legal Context

The investigating authorities found evidence that Lorincz had done internet searches into the state's self-defense statutes, which allow householders and others to shoot if there is a significant presumption of threat. The documentary constructs its narrative with the officer recordings generated during the repeated police visits to the scene before the killing, and then at the disturbing and disordered incident site itself – prefaced by 911 audio material of Lorincz calling the police in a melodramatically shaky voice. There is also police cell footage of the individual which has a disturbing, unsettling appeal.

Depiction of the Suspect

The documentary does not really imply anything too complex about Lorincz, or any mitigating factors. She is clearly unstable, although the kids are heard calling her a derogatory term, an ugly jibe. The production is showcased as an illustration of how “stand your ground” laws lead to senseless and tragic bloodshed. But the fact of firearm possession and the second amendment (that historic American constitutional privilege that a late commentator notoriously said made gun deaths a necessary cost) is not much highlighted.

Officer Questioning and Firearm Norms

It is possible to watch the officer questioning segments here and feel astonished at how minimal concern the police took in this point. When did she buy her gun? Where (if anywhere) did she train in its use? Was this the first time she discharged the weapon? How was the gun kept in her home? Could it have been easily accessible and prepared? The police aren’t shown asking any of these undoubtedly important questions (though they may have done in recordings that didn’t make the edit). Or is gun ownership so commonplace it would be like asking about microwaves or toasters?

Arrest and Aftermath

For what appeared to her local residents a extended period, Lorincz was not even arrested and charged, only detained and even provided accommodation away from home for the night (another parallel, incidentally, with the a prior incident). And when she was finally officially taken into custody in the detention area, there is an remarkable scene in which Lorincz simply declines to rise, will not extend her arms for the cuffs, not hostilely, but with the courteously pathetic demeanor of someone whose psychological state means that she is unable to comply. Had the kid-gloves treatment up until that point encouraged her to think that this could be effective?

Final Outcome and Judgment

It was not successful; and the panel's decision is revealed in the end titles. A deeply sobering picture of U.S. justice and consequences.