🔗 Share this article

Sunday 30 January 1972 remains one of the deadliest – and consequential – days throughout multiple decades of conflict in Northern Ireland.

Within the community of the incident – the images of that fateful day are displayed on the structures and etched in people's minds.

A public gathering was conducted on a cold but bright day in the city.

The protest was a protest against the policy of detention without trial – holding suspects without trial – which had been established after multiple years of unrest.

Soldiers from the Parachute Regiment fatally wounded multiple civilians in the Bogside area – which was, and remains, a predominantly republican community.

A specific visual became particularly iconic.

Pictures showed a religious figure, the priest, displaying a bloodied cloth in his effort to defend a group carrying a teenager, the injured teenager, who had been fatally wounded.

Journalists documented considerable film on the day.

The archive features the priest informing a reporter that soldiers "appeared to fire in all directions" and he was "absolutely certain" that there was no provocation for the gunfire.

That version of what happened wasn't accepted by the initial investigation.

The initial inquiry determined the Army had been attacked first.

During the peace process, the administration established a new investigation, following pressure by surviving kin, who said Widgery had been a cover-up.

During 2010, the findings by the investigation said that on balance, the soldiers had initiated shooting and that zero among the casualties had presented danger.

At that time head of state, the leader, apologised in the government chamber – stating fatalities were "unjustified and inexcusable."

Law enforcement commenced investigate the matter.

A military veteran, referred to as the defendant, was prosecuted for homicide.

Indictments were filed regarding the fatalities of one victim, 22, and twenty-six-year-old the second individual.

The accused was also accused of trying to kill Patrick O'Donnell, Joseph Friel, Joe Mahon, Michael Quinn, and an unnamed civilian.

Remains a court ruling maintaining the soldier's privacy, which his lawyers have maintained is required because he is at risk of attack.

He stated to the Saville Inquiry that he had exclusively discharged his weapon at individuals who were possessing firearms.

That claim was rejected in the concluding document.

Material from the examination could not be used immediately as testimony in the criminal process.

During the trial, the defendant was shielded from sight using a protective barrier.

He addressed the court for the opening instance in the hearing at a hearing in late 2024, to respond "not guilty" when the allegations were read.

Kin of the victims on Bloody Sunday made the trip from Derry to the judicial building daily of the proceedings.

One relative, whose sibling was died, said they understood that hearing the case would be painful.

"I visualize the events in my recollection," John said, as we walked around the primary sites referenced in the proceedings – from the location, where the victim was shot dead, to the adjacent the courtyard, where the individual and the second person were died.

"It reminds me to where I was that day.

"I assisted with my brother and place him in the vehicle.

"I experienced again every moment during the evidence.

"Notwithstanding enduring all that – it's still meaningful for me."